@Cawproductions I have said this many times - due to the advances in CPU speeds, and computer/software tech etc, and the fact everything can be done “in-the-box”, has completely rewritten the old rules for writing - recording - production - mixing - mastering
This use to be a predominantly linear process in expensive recording studios, often with different people with different skills (artist, studio tech/sound engineer for setting mics etc., producer, mixing engineer, mastering engineer)
Now this is often done by one person in their bedroom at home!
There are now opportunities to do everything in parallel- with the only limitation being computer power
I can see the merit in your approach (mixing “into” compressors and limiters) but I can’t help wondering if you potentially lose something in the mixing process
I personally really enjoy the various challenges and incremental improvements as the mix progresses - eg getting the mix sounding great in mono using mainly EQ, compression and reverb; then using stereo to place sounds in the stereo field, then using automation to make certain elements “pop”, and THEN applying mastering effects for the final polish
I tend to generally stick to this linear process to give me some “discipline” and milestones - eg now the recording is done I will move on to mixing, now that the mix is done I will move on to mastering
However, it is great that even at the final mixing stage I can decide to add a new part (guitar lick, vocal section etc.) by simply plugging in and hitting record at any time
If, when mastering, I notice the kick is too loud, or even out of time, I can just go straight to that track and fix it whilst mastering
These are AMAZING times to making music - it is just a shame that the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow has been stolen by Spotify!!